Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Williams v. Bateman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1932No. File No. 7485PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL,, P. J.

Sections 5755 to 5769, R. C. 19x9, provide a means for submitting to the electors of two or more counties under certain circumstances the question of the consolidation of such counties or the change of boundaries between them. Section 5755 reads as follows: “Whenever not less than one-third of the electors, based upon the total vote for governor at the last preceding election, of each of two or more adjoining counties of this state, shall petition the board of county commissioners of their respective counties that an election be held to determine the question of changing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Andrews v. BoydenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Farmers' Loan & Trust Bank v. HirningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State ex rel. Ketterling v. GregorySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. St. Lawrence Independent School Dist. v. Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Davis v. CramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. CarrollSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Missouri Farm Bureau Federation v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Papke v. DenuSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Healey v. RankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. McKillop v. County Board of Education of Sanborn Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API