Johnson v. Catoe
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Dissent
PLEICONES, Justice:
I respectfully dissent. Applying the five part test, enunciated in State v. Spann, 334 S.C. 618, 513 S.E.2d 98 (1999), a decision to grant petitioner a new trial rests upon the determination that Connie Hess’s confession “would probably change the result if a new trial were granted.” Id. at 619, 513 S.E.2d at 99. I believe the confession would probably change the result on retrial and, therefore, would grant petitioner’s motion for a new trial.
In support of the decision to deny petitioner’s new trial motion, the majority finds that, in light of her history of fabrications…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. MayfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- State v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. FowlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975