Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Catoe

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 11, 2001No. 25304Published

1Dissent

PLEICONES, Justice:

I respectfully dissent. Applying the five part test, enunciated in State v. Spann, 334 S.C. 618, 513 S.E.2d 98 (1999), a decision to grant petitioner a new trial rests upon the determination that Connie Hess’s confession “would probably change the result if a new trial were granted.” Id. at 619, 513 S.E.2d at 99. I believe the confession would probably change the result on retrial and, therefore, would grant petitioner’s motion for a new trial.

In support of the decision to deny petitioner’s new trial motion, the majority finds that, in light of her history of fabrications…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. MayfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  3. State v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API