Legal Opinion

Steiner & Voegtly Hardware Co. v. Tabor Sash Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided April 11, 1910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Steiner & Voegtly Hardware Company against the Tabor Sash Company. On final hearing. Decree for complainant.

1Opinion of the Court

REELSTAB, District Judge.

The complainant, as assignee of letters patent reissue No. 12,405 (applied for November 10, 1904), dated November 7, 1905 (original No. 488,761, dated December 27, 1892), and letters patent No. 580,127, dated April 6, 1897, granted to James H. Giesey, for certain new and useful improvements in windows, brings this suit against defendant for an alleged infringement of such patents.

The bill alleges that the improvements covered by said letters patients are capable of use conjointly in one and the same window, and that the defendant has so used them. It contains the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Detroit Motor Appliance Co. v. BurkeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1925
  2. Stead Lens Co. v. Kryptok Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. Kryptok Co. v. Stead Lens Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1913
  4. Johnson Automobile Lock Co. v. Noser Instant Auto Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  5. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Ferdinand Gutmann & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API