Legal Opinion
Convoy Company, an Oregon Corporation v. Sperry Rand Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1982No. 80-3266, 80-3288PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
This court remanded the initial judgment in favor of Convoy Company for a determination whether the judgment, when coupled with a prior settlement, resulted in a double recovery. Convoy Corp. v. Sperry Rand Corp., 601 F.2d 385 (9th Cir. 1979). On remand the district court found that Convoy’s total provable damages exceeded the total of the settlement and the judgment and entered judgment in the same amount previously entered.
On appeal Sperry Rand, (referred to as Univac) argues that the district court erred by including in the damages (a) prejudgment interest, (b) the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Aes Technology Systems, Inc. v. Coherent RadiationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- James Wilson, M. D., Ecg Systems, Inc. v. Marquette Electronics, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Ciluffo v. Middlesex General HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Krieg v. UNION PACIFIC LAND RESOURCES CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pacific Shores Properties, LLC v. City of Newport BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- VMark Software, Inc. v. EMC Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- James Turner, and Cross-Appellee v. Japan Lines, Ltd., and Philippine President Lines Inc., Manila, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.