Scott v. Kemper Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BEER, Judge.
Doris Ann Scott, individually and on behalf of her minor child, Lionel Bell, sought to prosecute a tort claim and, accordingly, entered into a contingent fee contract with attorney-intervenor E. Howard McCaleb, III. That contract provided, in part:
“In consideration of services rendered or to be rendered, I hereby assign to my said attorney an undivided 3314% interest in and to said claim if it is to be resolved that the claim is one for damages.
It is understood and agreed that neither I nor my said attorney may settle, compromise or dismiss or in any way discontinue *88my claim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Westside Transit Lines, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Wright v. FontanaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Kramer v. GrahamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Cabral v. HeitkampLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Dennis D. Carlson v. Nopal Lines, T. Smith and Sons, Inc., George W. Reese, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.