Legal Opinion

Scott v. Kemper Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1978No. 8938Published

1Opinion of the Court

BEER, Judge.

Doris Ann Scott, individually and on behalf of her minor child, Lionel Bell, sought to prosecute a tort claim and, accordingly, entered into a contingent fee contract with attorney-intervenor E. Howard McCaleb, III. That contract provided, in part:

“In consideration of services rendered or to be rendered, I hereby assign to my said attorney an undivided 3314% interest in and to said claim if it is to be resolved that the claim is one for damages.

It is understood and agreed that neither I nor my said attorney may settle, compromise or dismiss or in any way discontinue *88my claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Westside Transit Lines, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Wright v. FontanaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Kramer v. GrahamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Cabral v. HeitkampLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Dennis D. Carlson v. Nopal Lines, T. Smith and Sons, Inc., George W. Reese, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API