Legal Opinion

Dennis D. Carlson v. Nopal Lines, T. Smith and Sons, Inc., George W. Reese, Intervenor-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1972No. 72-1035PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:

The appellant is an attorney who was employed under a Louisiana statutory contingent fee contract. He appeals from a decree declining to award him compensation under the contract and instead granting him compensation on a quantum meruit basis. The District Court reached its conclusions on the basis of erroneous legal standards, so we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

By written contract dated November 27, 1970, the appellant George Reese, an attorney at law in Louisiana, was retained to represent Dennis Carlson in the prosecution of Carlson’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. HuntSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  2. United Gas Public Service Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Acadian Production Corp. v. LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Smith v. Westside Transit Lines, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Guilbeau v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Scott v. Kemper InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API