Legal Opinion

State v. Shaw

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 23, 1991No. 8036PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

The defendant appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of four counts of conspiracy to commit forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-139 (a) (3). He was tried with a codefendant, Romane Moore, who was found guilty of four counts of forgery in the second degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-139 (a) (2). The charges against the codefendants arose out of the same factual circumstances, although Moore was not charged with conspiracy.1

This case involves a scheme to procure, for a profit, forged Connecticut drivers’…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BoykinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. State v. MenziesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. State v. BattistaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. State v. AbrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. State v. IrvingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API