Legal Opinion

Picker v. Weiss

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Demekbeb to counterclaim.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

The plaintiffs sue for moneys alleged to have been converted by defendant,while acting as their agent. The defendant by way of counterclaim alleges as follows: “ For a separate defense and by way of, set off and counterclaim the defendant alleges that it being represented to plaintiffs and they knowing that the defendant had a number of customers who made their *23purchases of liquor only through defendant as a middleman and who depended upon defendant by reason ,of his furnishing them with proper stock pursuant to their orders given to him therefor, the plaintiffs employed defendant to sell…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Krower v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Schenck v. NaylorThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. George A. Fuller Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API