Legal Opinion

United States v. George A. Fuller Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 7, 1923No. 2485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORROCK, District Judge.

This action arises over the construction of what is commonly known as Camp Funston Cantonment, at Ft. Riley, this state. As brought, it is an action at law to recover a very large sum of money alleged to be the difference between what the construction of this cantonment actually cost the government and the fair and reasonable cost of the same. To this petition defendant has interposed a motion to make definite and certain, a motion to strike out from the pleading, and a demurrer thereto.

The demurrer was interposed on the theory, as the contract requires an inspection…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. United States v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Lalone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Heinemann v. . HeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
  2. United States v. Warren Transp. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925
  3. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API