People v. Askerneese
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant appeals from a conviction of assault in the first degree, arguing that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support the predicate “serious physical injury” standard required under Penal Law § 120.10 (1). When viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, however (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), the evidence in this case was suf ficient to allow a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that complainant suffered a “serious physical injury.” Thus,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. PlumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. KenwardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. KenneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.