Legal Opinion

People v. Askerneese

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant appeals from a conviction of assault in the first degree, arguing that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to support the predicate “serious physical injury” standard required under Penal Law § 120.10 (1). When viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, however (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), the evidence in this case was suf ficient to allow a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that complainant suffered a “serious physical injury.” Thus,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. PlumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. People v. KenwardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. KenneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API