Legal Opinion
In the Interest of D.M.B.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 29, 2015No. 04-14-00767-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
This is a restricted appeal from atrial court’s order terminating appellant father’s (“Father”) parental rights. On appeal, Father contends the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over him. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
In 2013, the Texas Department of Family Services (“the Department”) filed an original petition, seeking to terminate.Father’s parental rights to his children, D.M.B. and I.L.B., on numerous grounds.1 In the petition, the Department…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's BoutiqueTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Exito Electronics Co., Ltd. v. TrejoTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania v. LejeuneTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Serna v. Webster, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In the Interest of A.L.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In re R.A.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Cynthia Reina Houston v. Roman Paul Reina, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2026
- D. D. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2024
- E. H. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.