Legal Opinion
Brand v. Water Commissioners
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 30, 1922PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.
The individual petitioners make no claim to be furnished with water, but join on behalf of the Suburban Land Company Inc., which will be referred to herein as the petitioner. This corporation formerly was the sole owner of a tract of land in Billerica known as Nuttings Lake Park. It divided the land into house lots, and erected cottages thereon for summer residences. About two hundred of these have been sold to various owners, and each year three hundred are rented to tenants for a season beginning April 15 and ending October 15. Prior to July, 1917, the petitioner supplied with water all the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Silkman v. Board of Water CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Turner v. Revere Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Brass v. . RathboneNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Weld v. Board of Gas & Electric Light CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Boerth v. Detroit City Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Daley Construction Co. v. Planning Board of RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Fulghum v. Town of SelmaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Loring v. Commissioner of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.