Donegan v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
The above cases were, by stipulation, consolidated for trial, and are, upon this appeal, presented to us upon one set of briefs, and, for convenience, will be hereafter referred to as the “Dorsey” case and the “Donegan” case, respectively.
In the respective cases the plaintiffs had judgment quieting title to the lots hereafter mentioned, and the defendant appeals from the judgment in each case.
On the twenty-seventh day of April, 1925, the plaintiff Dorsey began an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to quiet title to lots 6,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Tyler v. SheaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Sherman v. . McKeonNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Kile v. Town of YellowheadIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Cape Girardeau & Thebes Bridge Terminal Railroad v. Southern Illinois & Missouri Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re American Fidelity CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- First National Bank of Marysville v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Regents of University of California v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.