Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Meadows

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1942No. 6 Div. 794PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff was the named beneficiary in a health and accident insurance policy issued by defendant company to her husband, Richard C. Meadows, and insuring against loss of life resulting from bodily injuries, effected solely through accidental means. The insured, Richard C. Meadows, did, on April 28, 1939, and while this policy was in force, receive bodily injuries (gun shot wounds), which resulted in his death. The defendant company declined to pay the loss, hence this suit, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

Plaintiff, afte'r…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'Bar v. Southern Life Health Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. California State Life Insurance v. FuquaArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'n v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Independent Life and Accident Insurance Co. of Jacksonville v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Taylor v. Insurance Company of North AmericaMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Britt v. All American Assurance Co. of LouisianaMississippi Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Life Casualty Ins. of Tennessee v. CrawfordAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API