Legal Opinion

Smith-Boyett Co. v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1929No. 715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion for Rehearing.

STANFORD, J.

Appellants’ motion for rehearing overruled, but our former opinion is withdrawn and in lieu thereof we file the following opinion:

This suit was filed-by appellee against appellants, alleging, in substance, that the parties to this suit purchased a highway contract from M. M. Cravens, and constructed the highway as required by said contract, under an agreement by the terms of which appellee was to receive one-fourth of the net profits of both money and machinery, and that the net profits due appellee, after deducting $4,-400 paid, was $3,739.78 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hines v. ParryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Seale v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. R. G. Andrews Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  4. Jones v. Texas Electric Ry.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Comer v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Liberty Sign Co. v. ArendaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API