Legal Opinion · Dissent

328 Owners Corp. v. 330 West 86 Oaks Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 17, 2006Published

1Dissent

Andrias, J. (dissenting).

The building in question, a five-story brownstone on West 86th Street, was conveyed by the City pursuant to article 16 of the General Municipal Law as an accelerated Urban Development Action Area Project (UDAAP). The facts are undisputed and are fairly stated by the majority.

Relying upon the three-prong test formulated by the Court of Appeals in Neponsit Prop. Owners’ Assn. v Emigrant Indus. Sav. Bank (278 NY 248, 254-255 [1938]), the majority finds that because the provision in the deed stating that the building was being conveyed by the City pursuant to article 16…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. City of New York v. Delafield 246 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Jennings Beach Ass'n v. KaiserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Lade v. AbbottNew York Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API