Legal Opinion

Jennings Beach Ass'n v. Kaiser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action for a judgment declaring the rights of the parties with respect to a restrictive covenant, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered July 27, 1987, which, upon granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, declared that the covenant prohibited the erection of more than one dwelling with customary out buildings for the use of employees on the property in question, and denied their cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

At issue is the meaning of a restrictive covenant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Telaro v. TelaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Orellano v. Samples Tire Equipment & Supply Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Booth v. . KnipeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Cohn v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Risucci v. HomayoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. 328 Owners Corp. v. 330 West 86 Oaks Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Gitlen v. GallupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Ford v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Liebowitz v. FormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Birch Tree Partners, LLC v. Windsor Digital Studio, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API