Legal Opinion

R. B. Boak & Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1926No. 4592PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

By this suit plaintiff in error (herein called plaintiff) in separate counts claimed damages for the alleged breach of eight similar alleged written contracts of the defendant in error (herein called defendant). One of those contracts, entered into at Mobile, Ala-., on March 3, 1920, named Mayaguez, P. R., as the port of destination, and stated:

“We have reserved space for you for 100 barrels pickled fish to above-named port at the rate of 55c per 100 lbs. to be forwarded by steamer, ‘a steameF (or substitute) to arrive about March shipment.
“Remarks: Freight prepaid. * * *

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The CaledoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Huntsville Elks Club v. Garrity-Hahn Building Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Ft. Morgan S. S. Co. v. Baltimore & Jamaica Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farr v. Hain S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Texas Star Flour MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
  3. United States v. Edward WassCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  4. Cohn v. United States Shipping BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  5. Huffman Towing, Inc. v. Mainstream Shipyard & Supply, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API