State v. Stewart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Before their arraignment the prisoners filed a plea in abatement and moved to quash the indictment on the ground that the bill had been considered, passed upon, and approved by the grand jury when only thirteen of its members were present. This body, "serving for a period of six months, had been impaneled and charged at a former term; but when the indictment was found five of the number were unavoidably absent. All who were present voted to endorse and return the indictment “a true bill.” Afterwards two of the absent members came in, but took no part in finding the indictment or returning it…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. Wilcox.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- State v. . CraneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- State v. . McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. . SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. FarnsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. . SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.