Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Oakdale Irrigation District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1928No. Docket No. 3457PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiffs had judgment in an action prosecuted to establish a preferential right to the use of certain waters of the Stanislaus River, from which judgment the defendants appeal.

The plaintiffs are the owners of certain tracts of land located within the vicinity of Knights Perry, in the county of Stanislaus, which lands have been irrigated for over fifty years from waters taken from the Stanislaus river and conveyed to said lands by means of a certain dam and ditch diverting the waters of said Stanislaus River thereto. None of the lands belonging to the plaintiffs lie within the exterior…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Price v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Smith v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API