Huval v. Dupuis

MILLER, Judge.

In this boundary action, plaintiffs appeal the judgment establishing defendants’ south boundary in accordance with the court appointed surveyor’s “ideal boundary” rather than along a boundary allegedly established by the respective parties’ ancestors in title. We affirm.

An unusual aspect of this case is that to establish the disputed boundary, the trial court was first required to determine the boundary of an adjacent tract which boundary had never been judicially or extra judicially fixed.

The seventeen plaintiffs are the owners of a nine-tenths interest in a tract inherited…