Legal Opinion
Neely v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 16, 1936No. A-9084PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The plaintiff in error in this opinion, for convenience referred to as the defendant, was convicted of having possession of a whisky still capable of manufacturing and distilling intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of 30 days.
The testimony in this case shows the officers of Payne county went to the home of the defendant and searched his premises; about three-quarters of a mile from defendant’s home they found an old cave in which there were some barrels and other rubbish, but it showed no evidence of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
- Appleby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Klaassen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Kizer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Chase v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Love v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.