Legal Opinion

Mills v. Moore

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 12, 2001No. SC01-338PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

786 So.2d 532 (2001)

Gregory MILLS, Petitioner,

v.

Michael W. MOORE, etc., Respondent.

No. SC01-338.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 2001.

Todd G. Scher, Litigation Director, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kenneth S. Nunnelley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

Gregory Mills, a prisoner under sentence of death, petitions this Court for writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const. We deny Mills' petition for writ of habeas corpus for the reasons that…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Anstead; Dissent · Pariente.

3Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by45 opinions

  1. Bottoson v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. King v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Douglas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API