Legal Opinion

King v. Moore

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 24, 2002No. SC02-1457PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

831 So.2d 143 (2002)

Amos Lee KING, Petitioner,

v.

Michael W. MOORE, etc., Respondent.

No. SC02-1457.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 24, 2002.

William Jennings, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel—Middle Region, and Kevin T. Beck, Assistant CCRC, Eric Pinkard, Assistant CCRC, and Mark Gruber, Assistant CCRC, Middle Region, Tampa, FL; and Mark E. Olive of Law Offices of Mark E. Olive, P.A., Tallahaseee, FL, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Carol M. Dittmar, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Stephen D. Ake, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Respondent.

Charles T.…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · Wells; Concurrence · Harding; Concurrence · Wells; Concurrence · Anstead; Concurrence · Shaw; Concurrence · Pariente; Concurrence · Lewis.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Turner v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Sochor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Bottoson v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. England v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API