Legal Opinion

Ruffin v. Albright

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 22, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBodine, J.

Eelator seeks to quash the return to an alternative writ of mandamus and to have granted to him a peremptory writ of mandamus directing payment to him of benefits from the one per cent. fund.

The statute is as follows (R. S. 34:15-95) : “The sums collected under section 34:15-94 the terms of this title shall constitute a fund out of which a sum shall be set aside each year by the Commissioner of Labor from which compensation payments in accordance with the provisions of paragraph lib of section 34:15-12 of this title shall be made to persons totally disabled, as a result of experiencing a…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Travelers Insurance Company v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Schulman v. MaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Mayti v. MaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Waltman v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API