Ruffin v. Albright
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtBodine, J.
Eelator seeks to quash the return to an alternative writ of mandamus and to have granted to him a peremptory writ of mandamus directing payment to him of benefits from the one per cent. fund.
The statute is as follows (R. S. 34:15-95) : “The sums collected under section 34:15-94 the terms of this title shall constitute a fund out of which a sum shall be set aside each year by the Commissioner of Labor from which compensation payments in accordance with the provisions of paragraph lib of section 34:15-12 of this title shall be made to persons totally disabled, as a result of experiencing a…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Travelers Insurance Company v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Schulman v. MaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Mayti v. MaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Waltman v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.