Legal Opinion

FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. Copeland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 22, 1963No. 39867PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

1. Where a motion to dismiss an action is sustained by the trial court and it appears from the record that the ground upon which this motion was sustained was not a ground which adjudicated the merits of the controversy, such judgment of dismissal will not be a bar to a subsequent proceeding for the same cause of action brought within the time allowed by law. Code §§ 110-503, 110-504. Keith v. Darby, 104 Ga. App. 624 (122 SE2d 463) and cits.

2. The foregoing rule of law is applicable to those cases where ■ the dismissal was for want of prosecution. Kinney v. Avery &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keith v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Kinney v. Avery & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Maxey v. CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Millholland v. OglesbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Old South Invest. Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API