FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. Copeland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carlisle, Presiding Judge.
1. Where a motion to dismiss an action is sustained by the trial court and it appears from the record that the ground upon which this motion was sustained was not a ground which adjudicated the merits of the controversy, such judgment of dismissal will not be a bar to a subsequent proceeding for the same cause of action brought within the time allowed by law. Code §§ 110-503, 110-504. Keith v. Darby, 104 Ga. App. 624 (122 SE2d 463) and cits.
2. The foregoing rule of law is applicable to those cases where ■ the dismissal was for want of prosecution. Kinney v. Avery &…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keith v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Kinney v. Avery & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Maxey v. CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Millholland v. OglesbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Old South Invest. Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.