Legal Opinion

Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2007PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 In these three unconsolidated appeals, Appellant manufacturers 1 challenge the $1,400,000 judgment against them 2 in a products Lability action based on allegations that Appellee’s decedent Edward J. Bugosh contracted malignant mesothelio-ma 3 from exposure to their asbestos-con taining products. We address, inter alia, the request by Appellant Taylored to mold the verdict to reflect funds received by Appellee from the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust, finding, pursuant to the requirements of the Trust Distribution Process, that Appellant’s claim has been…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Sunbeam Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Berrier v. Simplicity Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Tindall v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Schmidt v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Dubose, R. v. Quinlan, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API