Legal Opinion
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Trade Exchange Network Limited
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 3, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Civil Contempt and Motion to Vacate Order Imposing Sanctions)
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge
On December 3, 2014, this Court ordered that defendants, Trade Exchange Network Ltd. (“TEN”) and Intrade the Prediction Market Ltd. (“Intrade”), show cause as to why they are not in civil contempt of the Court’s June 24, 2014 Order [33]. Order Granting Pi’s Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defs. Are Not in Civil Contempt and for Sanctions at 1, Dec. 3, 2014, ECF No. 37 (“December 3 Order”). Before the Court are the United States Commodity Futures Trading…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Broderick, Catherine v. Donaldson, WilliamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc. v. Guest Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Guardado v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- McBroom v. Ethicon IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- United States v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024