Legal Opinion

Estate of Jenkins v. Guyton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1995PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

The Estate of Richard Jenkins appeals from the lower courts’ refusal to bar the claim of a creditor of the estate, Thomas Guyton, as untimely filed. The specific issue presented here is whether the executor’s communication to Guyton’s attorney that (1) Jenkins had died, and (2) that his will was being probated in Davidson County, constitutes the “actual notice” required under Tenn.Code Ann. § 30-2-307(a)(l) to limit the period for filing claims against the estate to six months, thus rendering the claim untimely. We hold that such communication does not constitute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bowden v. WardTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re: Estate of Martha M. TannerTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Heflin v. KoszelaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. Estate of Decker v. Farm Credit Services of Mid-America, ACAIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bilbrey v. SmithersTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API