Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1930No. 20340. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

The petitioner, by leave of this court, has brought here for review the record of the circuit court of Cook county confirming an award of the Industrial Commission against him in favor of Mary Allesch as the dependent mother of Frank Allesch, deceased.

By stipulation of parties the only controverted questions before the court are: First, is the mother of an illegitimate child a parent within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act; and second, if so, was the claimant in fact dependent on the deceased, who was her illegitimate son.

Mary Allesch, while a single woman, gave birth to an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murrell v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bales v. ElderIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Morrow v. MorrowIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Richardson Sand Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Middleton v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. In Re Arnold M.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Lopo v. Union Pacific Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Claim of Bamberg v. Irving's Auto Repair ShopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API