Legal Opinion
Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(2)-(3)
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 16, 1998No. 91536PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
The Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, in response to a request from this Court, has filed a petition for expedited review of a proposed amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(2)-(3). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.
In light of the Court’s recent decision in State v. Bowen, 698 So.2d 248 (Fla.1997), which illustrates the apparent difficulty trial courts are having in complying with the dictates of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Faretta1 the Court asked the Criminal Procedure Rules Committee to make suggestions for standardizing the courtroom…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Peter R. Fitzpatrick v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
- State v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Aguirre-Jarquin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- McCray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Potts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.