McKenzie v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Norman Blake McKenzie appeals his convictions for first-degree murder and his sentences of death. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we affirm McKenzie’s convictions and sentences.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 17, 2006, a grand jury indicted the appellant, Norman Blake McKenzie, on two counts of first-degree murder for the homicides of Randy Wayne Peacock and Charles Frank Johnston. The charges against McKenzie resulted from the October 5, 2006, discovery of the bodies of Peacock and Johnston at a residence located in St. Johns…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- McCray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Ault v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Robards v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Rimmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Hardwick v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.