Legal Opinion

State v. Willett

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 9, 2000No. 99-2671-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

¶ 1. Guy R. Willett appeals from an amended judgment that changed the sentencing structure four months after the original sentencing. The sentencing court originally held that the sentences for the three convictions which were before the court that day could not be served consecutively to a sentence Willett was to receive four days later when his probation was revoked. A third of a year later, the court was convinced that its original ruling was based on an erroneous understanding of the law and changed the three sentences so that they were consecutive to the later sentence. We agree with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. State v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GruetzmacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. Jacqueline R. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. State v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  5. State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API