State v. Howard, 2007 Ca 42 (5-9-2008)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Michael E. Howard appeals from a judgment of the Fairborn Municipal Court, which found him guilty following his no contest plea to operating a vehicle while intoxicated (second offense within six years), possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of marijuana, and speeding. Howard entered his plea following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. For the following reasons, we conclude that the trial court did not err in overruling the motion to suppress. Accordingly, the judgment will be AFFIRMED.

I

{¶ 2} According to the state's evidence at the suppression hearing, at…