Commonwealth v. Andrews
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge.
We are asked in this appeal to determine whether a delay of two years and eleven months between conviction and imposition of sentence is a denial of appellant’s right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution or a violation of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. After careful review and consideration of the circumstances present in this case, we hold that appellant’s speedy trial and due process rights were not violated. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of sentence.
Joan Andrews was arrested on May 10,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wayne Paul Burkett v. Richard Cunningham, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DiazSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. AndersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. BrockwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993