Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Anders

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1997PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We certified this case for en banc review to address the following question: Does Pa. R.Crim. P. 1405 (“Rule 1405”) require that a defendant who is not sentenced within sixty days of conviction or the entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere be discharged? We hold that Rule 1405 does not mandate discharge for untimely sentencing.

The facts and procedural histoiy of the case are not complex. On April 26, 1996, appellant Joseph Wayne Anders, Jr. pleaded guilty to one count of driving under the influence of alcohol.1

Rule 1405(A) governs the timing of appellant’s sentence. It reads, in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. BarudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. HernandezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. AndersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. VeselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. AustinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API