Legal Opinion

The Dolbadarn Castle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1915No. 2430PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California; M. T. Dooling, Judge. _ _ Suit in admiralty by Parrott & Co., a corporation, against the bark Dolbadarn Castle, the Dolbadarn Castle Shipping Company, Limited, claimant. Decree for respondent (212 Fed. 565), and libelant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The appellant brought a libel against the Dolbadarn Castle, to recover for damages to certain freight shipped at Rotterdam to be transported tb San Francisco. The libel alleged that in February, 1910, the appellant shipped on said bark in good order and condition, 2,023 sheets or steel plates, and 2,775 barrels of cement, and that the said goods were not delivered in like good order and condition, but were 'damaged while they were on board and in the custody of the bark. The claimant, the appellee herein, *839alleged as an affirmative defense that the loss and damage…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The FolminaSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Whitney v. OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  3. The PatriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  4. The St. QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  5. The Konigin LuiseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herman v. Compagnie Générale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. San Francisco & P. S. S. Co. v. Leggett S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  3. The Milwaukee BridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  4. The KearneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  5. The La DromeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API