Legal Opinion
Markell v. Markell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 24, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*833In a stipulation of settlement dated May 14, 2002, the plaintiff former wife and the defendant former husband agreed, inter alia, that the defendant would pay child support on the fifteenth day of each month, and that unreimbursed health care expenses for their children would be divided equally after the plaintiff paid the initial sum of $500 per child. The Supreme Court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law dated December 10, 2002, which reflected this agreement. However, the judgment of divorce, which was entered on December 10, 2002, provided that the defendant was to pay child…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohen v. KrantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Skrodelis v. NorbergsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Kuhn v. Town of JohnstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- Diecidue v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re HaroldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re HaroldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re HiletzarisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re HiletzarisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.