Legal Opinion

Dike v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 3, 1970No. 51-69PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

This equitable proceeding for a declaratory judgment arises out of a threatened tax sale of property which the plaintiff owns jointly with her husband. Although the tax sale was ordered discontinued, other provisions of the chancellor’s order led the plaintiff to appeal. 1

Mrs. Dike and her husband own property in Bristol on which, at the time of this litigation, a part of the taxes levied remained owing. This property was advertised for sale for unpaid taxes. It is uncontroverted that the plaintiff did not receive notice of the pending sale as required by 32 V.S.A. § 5252. It was this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Braune v. Town of RochesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  2. City of Winooski v. MatteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Hartford v. Faith Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. In Re Smith, Bell & Hauck Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  3. Hojaboom v. Town of SwantonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Town of Bristol v. United States ex rel. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1970
  5. Ran-Mar, Inc. v. City of BarreVermont Superior Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API