Legal Opinion

Wood v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1905Published

Appeal by the plaintiff, William P. Wood, from' an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Monroe Special Term and entered" in the office of the clerk of the county of Steuben on tlie 19th day of December, 1904, as resettled, denying the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint in the action.

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, J.:

The order should be reversed, without costs, and motion granted upon the condition hereafter provided, or if conditions are not complied with, the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

*227The action was to recover damages for personal injuries to plain-tiff, alleged to have resulted from defendant’s negligence. The case was tried and the court granted a nonsuit. An appeal was taken and the Appellate Division reversed the trial court and ordered a new trial. (83 App. Div. 604.) The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals and gave the usual stipulation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bossout v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Roberts v. . BaumgartenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Lewin v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Wood v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Northam v. Dutchess County Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API