Royal v. . Sampson County
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.
Except for certain purposes expressly named, tbe North Carolina Constitution prohibits counties and cities from contracting debts during any fiscal year “to an amount exceeding two-thirds of tbe amount by which tbe outstanding indebtedness of tbe particular county or municipality shall have been reduced during tbe next preceding fiscal year, unless tbe subject be submitted to a vote of tbe people of a particular county or municipality.” Constitution, Article V, section 4.
Tbe county of Sampson passed tbe necessary ordinances and proposes to issue and sell $49,500 bonds during tbe present…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- City of Council Bluffs v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Levy v. . McClellanNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- City of Chicago v. McDonaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- German Ins. Co. of Freeport v. City of ManningU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Coe v. . Surry CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946