Legal Opinion

Sandweiss v. National Bank

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 1999No. Docket No. 205878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners appeal as of right from the probate court’s order granting respondent’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8). We affirm.

Petitioners filed a petition to require a full accounting from respondent as the successor trustee of the Alfred H. Goldman Marital Trust and to surcharge respondent for breaching its fiduciary duties relative to the marital trust. The probate court’s order set forth the following succinct history of this case:

Alfred H. Goldman died on October 17, 1970. Surviving him were his wife, Francis [sic] Goldman [Abelcop] and a son, Barry A. Goldman.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hayes-Albion Corp. v. KuberskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. L. A. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Raak v. RaakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. DukeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  2. Echelon Homes, LLC v. Carter Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Echelon Homes, LLC v. Carter Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. In Re Goldman EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. PSA QUALITY SYSTEMS (TORONTO), INC. v. SutcliffeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API