Legal Opinion
Chambers v. Cooney
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided January 23, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0373-WS-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant SurModies, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 40). The Motion has been briefed and is ripe for disposition at this time.
I. Relevant Background.
A detailed review of the factual underpinnings and procedural posture of this consolidated action is unnecessary to resolve the discrete issues raised in the Rule 12 Motion. In the Amended Complaint (doc. 38, Exh. 6), Michael J. Cooney, M.D. (“Dr.Cooney”) brought certain claims against SurModies, Inc. (“SurModies”) and others based on SurModies’ acquisition of a company…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wagner v. Daewoo Heavy Industries America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Lonnie J. Hill v. Thomas E. White, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Financial SEC. Assur., Inc. v. Stephens, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- San Francisco Residence Club, Inc. v. Baswell-GuthrieDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
- Brown v. ToscanoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008