Legal Opinion

HOYLE v. CROZIER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 2022No. 2:22-cv-03049Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NICHOLAS AUSTIN HOYLE, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-3049 : PATRICK A. CROZIER, et al. : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM RUFE, J. October 12, 2022 Plaintiff Nicholas Austin Hoyle brings this pro se civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on his arrest and subsequent prosecution in state court. Hoyle seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following reasons, the Court will grant Hoyle leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the Complaint in part with prejudice and in part without…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API