Legal Opinion
Boarhog LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 14, 2016No. 16-678CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contract Disputes Act Claim; Termination for Convenience Clause; Motion to Dismiss; No Showing of Material Breach or Performance Costs.
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WHEELER, Judge.
This ease involves the U.S. Navy’s termination for convenience of a services contract awarded to Plaintiff Boarhog LLC. The Navy terminated the contract in order to implement corrective action as part of a plan to resolve a bid protest. Boarhog contends that the termination constituted a breach of contract, and it asks for damages of $229,608 even though Boarhog did not perform any work under the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Daniel A. Lindsay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Sommers Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- James M. Ellett Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cotton & Company, LLP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Barlovento, LLC v. AUI, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2021