Legal Opinion

People v. Foote

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1892PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Allegan. (Palmer, J., presiding.) Respondent was convicted of uttering a forged note, and sentenced to imprisonment in the State House of Correction at Ionia for two years and six months. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The respondent was convicted of having uttered a false, forged promissory note. He waived examination before the justice. The objections raised to the information and conviction are these:

1. The information does not follow the warrant, in that the warrant charges the offense to have been committed November 18, 1890, while the information charges it as November 18, 1889; also that the note is described in the warrant as signed by “L. D. Foote & Co.,” while in the information it is described as signed by “L. D. Foote.”

2. The court erroneously permitted one Newnham, an attorney, to assist the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Ulrich v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. FalknerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. EddingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. KotekMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. FoleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. JamesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API