State v. Howley
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDEVITT, Chief Justice.
This is a criminal case on interlocutory appeal regarding the State’s motion in limine to disallow the defense of necessity. The State filed this interlocutory appeal, arguing that the district court erred in denying its motion in limine on the grounds that the elements for the defense of necessity were not supported by the record and transcript which have been presented, pursuant to stipulation, on appeal. We reverse the district court’s denial of the State’s motion in limine and remand.
I
BACKGROUND AND FACTS
On November 20, 1991, at approximately 8:30 p.m., Láveme…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. FodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JohnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. EastmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GrubeIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. KornIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BushIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ElisonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Dachlet v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. EbyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.