Legal Opinion

Hanshue v. Marvin Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 2, 1919No. 9201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Yuma Dist/rict Court, Hon. H. P. Bwrke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGarrigues, C. J.

The parties will be designated, as in the lower court, plaintiff and defendants. The title emanating from the United States to the SW]4> 11-3-48, Yuma County, Colorado, vests by certain mesne conveyances in the plaintiff, the Marvin Investment Company, defendant in error, unless divested by the title of Mary E. Hanshue, defendant below and plaintiff in error. Hanshue deraigns title from a tax deed to Muntzing and Murray, and a subsequent action by them in the County Court to quiet title. In December, 1901, Muntzing and Murray obtained the tax deed to the land, and October 17, 1904, commenced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Kavanagh v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Farmers' Union Ditch Co. v. Rio Grande Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Mortgage Trust Co. of Pennsylvania v. ReddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Trowbridge v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. ConnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Jotter v. MarvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API