Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lane v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 31, 2017No. 2015-KH-2170Published

1Per curiam

11 Denied. Relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Lane v. State, 16-2217 (La. 1/23/17), 209 So.3d 87. We attach hereto and make a part hereof the district court’s written reasons denying relief.

*843[[Image here]]

OPINION

The Court has fbr-its consideration Feffiioner's'lViotion to. Withdraw Guilty ¾⅝ filed on July 2,2015, Fo'rthe reasons stated below4he Petitioner's'motkm-is DENIES,

Petitioner was -charged, with an indictment: for Second Degree Murder, On June .14,2dl1, the .State, fifed an amended.indictroent of manslaughter,'to which Petitíoner pTeAgiñity.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API