Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lane v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 23, 2017No. 2016-KH-2217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

11 WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct. R. X § 5.

Relator has now exhausted his right to obtain post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator has filed…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API